Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 25(5): 483-489, Sept.-Oct. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-893650

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effect of bite positions characterizing different splint treatments (anterior repositioning and stabilization splints) on the disc-condyle relation in patients with TMJ disc displacement with reduction (DDwR), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods: 37 patients, with a mean age of 18.8±4.3 years (7 male and 30 females) and diagnosed with DDwR based on the RDC/TMD, were recruited. MRI metrical analysis of the spatial changes of the disc/condyle, as well as their relationships, was done in three positions: maximum intercuspation (Position 1), anterior repositioning splint position (Position 2), and stabilization splint position (Position 3). Disc/condyle coordinate measurements and disc condyle angles were determined and compared. Results: In Position 1, the average disc-condyle angle was 53.4° in the 60 joints with DDwR, while it was −13.3° with Position 2 and 30.1° with Position 3. The frequency of successful "disc recapture" with Position 2 was significantly higher (58/60, 96.7%) than Position 3 (20/60, 33.3%). In Positions 2 and 3, the condyle moved forward and downward while the disc moved backward. The movements were, however, more remarkable with Position 2. Conclusions: Anterior repositioning of the mandible improves the spatial relationship between the disc and condyle in patients with DDwR. In addition to anterior and inferior movement of the condyle, transitory posterior movement of the disc also occurred.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Occlusal Splints , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/injuries , Joint Dislocations/physiopathology , Joint Dislocations/therapy , Mandibular Condyle/injuries , Reference Values , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Treatment Outcome , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Design , Incisor/physiopathology , Mandibular Condyle/physiopathology , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging
2.
J. appl. oral sci ; 24(5): 447-452, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-797974

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: This study investigated the Weibull parameters and 5% fracture probability of direct, indirect composites, and CAD/CAM composites. Material and Methods: Discshaped (12 mm diameter x 1 mm thick) specimens were prepared for a direct composite [Z100 (ZO), 3M-ESPE], an indirect laboratory composite [Ceramage (CM), Shofu], and two CAD/CAM composites [Lava Ultimate (LU), 3M ESPE; Vita Enamic (VE), Vita Zahnfabrik] restorations (n=30 for each group). The specimens were polished, stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C. Weibull parameters (m= modulus of Weibull, σ0= characteristic strength) and flexural strength for 5% fracture probability (σ5%) were determined using a piston-on-three-balls device at 1 MPa/s in distilled water. Statistical analysis for biaxial flexural strength analysis were performed either by both one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc (α=0.05) or by Pearson's correlation test. Results: Ranking of m was: VE (19.5), LU (14.5), CM (11.7), and ZO (9.6). Ranking of σ0 (MPa) was: LU (218.1), ZO (210.4), CM (209.0), and VE (126.5). σ5% (MPa) was 177.9 for LU, 163.2 for CM, 154.7 for Z0, and 108.7 for VE. There was no significant difference in the m for ZO, CM, and LU. VE presented the highest m value and significantly higher than ZO. For σ0 and σ5%, ZO, CM, and LU were similar but higher than VE. Conclusion: The strength characteristics of CAD/ CAM composites vary according to their composition and microstructure. VE presented the lowest strength and highest Weibull modulus among the materials.


Subject(s)
Zirconium/chemistry , Computer-Aided Design , Silicates/chemistry , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tocopherols/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Reference Values , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Tooth Fractures , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Probability , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Pliability , Dental Restoration Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL